{# canonical_base is the OWNING tenant's origin: all 16 Peasy domains serve the same catalogue, so a page rendered by a non-owner points its canonical at the owner instead of competing with it. Falls back to this site for static/self-owned pages. #}
🍋
Menu
Comparison Beginner 1 min read 229 words

Subtitle and Caption Formats: SRT, VTT, ASS, and SSA Compared

Subtitles improve accessibility and engagement but come in many formats. Each format has different styling, positioning, and platform support capabilities.

Common Subtitle Formats

SRT (SubRip)

The most widely supported format. Plain text with timestamps and sequential numbering. No styling beyond basic HTML-like tags (, ) that few players honor.

Support: Universal (VLC, YouTube, Vimeo, most platforms). Limitation: No positioning, colors, or fonts.

VTT (WebVTT)

The HTML5 standard for web video. Supports CSS-like styling, positioning, and metadata. Used by all major streaming platforms and the element.

Support: All modern browsers, YouTube, most platforms. Advantage: Styling, positioning, regions, karaoke timing.

ASS/SSA (Advanced SubStation Alpha)

The most powerful format with full typographic control — fonts, colors, animations, positioning, and effects. Popular in anime fansub communities.

Support: VLC, MPC, mpv, MKV containers. Limitation: No web browser support. Requires JavaScript libraries like SubtitlesOctopus for web.

Comparison Table

Feature SRT VTT ASS/SSA
Styling Minimal CSS-like Full
Positioning No Yes Yes
Web support Via JS Native Via JS
Animation No Limited Yes
Karaoke No Yes Yes
Metadata No Yes Yes

Choosing the Right Format

  • Web delivery: VTT (native support)
  • YouTube upload: SRT (most widely accepted)
  • Video files: SRT for compatibility, ASS for styling
  • Accessibility compliance: VTT (WCAG recommended)